New technology is created with the
intent to bring convenience and ease to peoples’ daily lives. Innovations are
the result of problem solving, not merely from businesses attempting to profit.
However, in our increasingly fast-paced, work-oriented, consumerist society new
technology creates barriers to happiness because people are expected to DO more
instead of have more leisure time, consumers are expected to HAVE more updated
technology instead of being satisfied with their current lifestyles, and we
lack a concrete set of moral guidelines for dealing with new technology.
While the majority of innovations are
guilty of this paradox, Apple technology in particular exemplifies this inconsistency.
The iPad/iPhone duo (and their ability to sync over the cloud) was created to
simplify and combine the functions of communication, education, and
entertainment. Phone, email, calendars, and various other apps exist in order
to aid consumers’ productivity while most music, videos, and books are available
purely for entertainment. However, instead of allowing people to finish their
jobs efficiently and spend extra time solely on leisure, this technology has
created an expectation for people to constantly work, maintain relationships,
and “relax” on-the-go. Meanwhile, consumers lose control over their privacy as
companies gain the ability to track the items they buy, games they play, and
even the things that they search on the internet.
With this information, companies are
enabled to market more directly to individuals. However, businesses continue to
sell “pleasure” through advertisements that reinforce our cultural status quo
because the imbalance of power within our society is the force driving
capitalism. While they are not underprivileged, average individuals experience
a perceived need for more when they can compare themselves to those who have
excess. Individuals’ freedoms are limited by greed, carelessness, and ignorance
within our society.
Historically,
our society has treated economics as a zero-sum game; our predecessors took
land from the natives, used slaves to cultivate the land, and practiced the
Monroe Doctrine to protect their interests in nearby foreign land while
avoiding dangerous wars with powerful empires overseas. Currently, American consumers
are being manipulated by large corporations. The upper class (which tends to be
the same demographic as the original colonists) manages large businesses, and
therefore has significant power within the economy. The upper class also tends
to be highly visible in the media, enabling this socioeconomic minority to set
trends that are unobtainable for the majority. These trends are expanded upon
advertisements that target consumers’ insecurities and desires. Internet tracking
allows businesses to send specific advertisements that target the most susceptible
individuals. Because they are raised within this exploitative culture, people
typically do not question the system. Acceptance of the status quo limits
consumers’ investigative curiosity. This ignorance allows businesses to further
exploit consumers, who do not use their purchasing power to “vote” for more
morally sound business practices because they are unaware of corruption or unwilling to sacrifice potential profits from low prices in exchange for protected privacy.
I agree with your blog. In order to change the consumerist path we’re on, people need to stop purchasing these absurd gadgets. This would send a message to the status quo that we’re not going to blindly accept what they give us. However, how many people actually practice this stance? Furthermore, it appears that ordinary people support tracking by not only purchasing products but by “tracking” their fellow citizens as well.Therefore, you brought up some great points about how the problem is not only advertisers but society in general. Ethical questions need to be addressed and solved.
ReplyDeleteI think the things that you talked about are very true. Yes we do need to stop buying into the things that we are being advertised to us and stop purchasing those things that are not of that much importance to us. I think by us being more mindful of the things that we are being told is important and starting to open up our minds and choosing the things that are important to us by not buying into the things being sold, would send a message to the companies. So in doing this we could limit the amount of tracking that companies do. I do agree with your overall view which is how we as a society are apart of the problem.
ReplyDeleteMara,
ReplyDeleteI liked your commentary on the way that things similar to Apple’s Cloud create an expectation for people to always be working. I know that I myself have become completely synced to a network on my phone where I can constantly access my 6 different email accounts, monitor bank statements, track documents, and create calendars that are constantly edited by those who participate in my schedule. The truth is that the efficiency component of electronics no longer gives the user opportunity to walk away, only opportunity to do more on the device.