Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Exploitative Economics, Advertisements, and Consumerist Culture

New technology is created with the intent to bring convenience and ease to peoples’ daily lives. Innovations are the result of problem solving, not merely from businesses attempting to profit. However, in our increasingly fast-paced, work-oriented, consumerist society new technology creates barriers to happiness because people are expected to DO more instead of have more leisure time, consumers are expected to HAVE more updated technology instead of being satisfied with their current lifestyles, and we lack a concrete set of moral guidelines for dealing with new technology.

While the majority of innovations are guilty of this paradox, Apple technology in particular exemplifies this inconsistency. The iPad/iPhone duo (and their ability to sync over the cloud) was created to simplify and combine the functions of communication, education, and entertainment. Phone, email, calendars, and various other apps exist in order to aid consumers’ productivity while most music, videos, and books are available purely for entertainment. However, instead of allowing people to finish their jobs efficiently and spend extra time solely on leisure, this technology has created an expectation for people to constantly work, maintain relationships, and “relax” on-the-go. Meanwhile, consumers lose control over their privacy as companies gain the ability to track the items they buy, games they play, and even the things that they search on the internet.

With this information, companies are enabled to market more directly to individuals. However, businesses continue to sell “pleasure” through advertisements that reinforce our cultural status quo because the imbalance of power within our society is the force driving capitalism. While they are not underprivileged, average individuals experience a perceived need for more when they can compare themselves to those who have excess. Individuals’ freedoms are limited by greed, carelessness, and ignorance within our society.


Historically, our society has treated economics as a zero-sum game; our predecessors took land from the natives, used slaves to cultivate the land, and practiced the Monroe Doctrine to protect their interests in nearby foreign land while avoiding dangerous wars with powerful empires overseas. Currently, American consumers are being manipulated by large corporations. The upper class (which tends to be the same demographic as the original colonists) manages large businesses, and therefore has significant power within the economy. The upper class also tends to be highly visible in the media, enabling this socioeconomic minority to set trends that are unobtainable for the majority. These trends are expanded upon advertisements that target consumers’ insecurities and desires. Internet tracking allows businesses to send specific advertisements that target the most susceptible individuals. Because they are raised within this exploitative culture, people typically do not question the system. Acceptance of the status quo limits consumers’ investigative curiosity. This ignorance allows businesses to further exploit consumers, who do not use their purchasing power to “vote” for more morally sound business practices because they are unaware of corruption or unwilling to sacrifice potential profits from low prices in exchange for protected privacy.

3 comments:

  1. I agree with your blog. In order to change the consumerist path we’re on, people need to stop purchasing these absurd gadgets. This would send a message to the status quo that we’re not going to blindly accept what they give us. However, how many people actually practice this stance? Furthermore, it appears that ordinary people support tracking by not only purchasing products but by “tracking” their fellow citizens as well.Therefore, you brought up some great points about how the problem is not only advertisers but society in general. Ethical questions need to be addressed and solved.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the things that you talked about are very true. Yes we do need to stop buying into the things that we are being advertised to us and stop purchasing those things that are not of that much importance to us. I think by us being more mindful of the things that we are being told is important and starting to open up our minds and choosing the things that are important to us by not buying into the things being sold, would send a message to the companies. So in doing this we could limit the amount of tracking that companies do. I do agree with your overall view which is how we as a society are apart of the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mara,

    I liked your commentary on the way that things similar to Apple’s Cloud create an expectation for people to always be working. I know that I myself have become completely synced to a network on my phone where I can constantly access my 6 different email accounts, monitor bank statements, track documents, and create calendars that are constantly edited by those who participate in my schedule. The truth is that the efficiency component of electronics no longer gives the user opportunity to walk away, only opportunity to do more on the device.

    ReplyDelete